国际清算银行-DeFi杠杆（英）-2024.3.docx

《国际清算银行-DeFi杠杆（英）-2024.3.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《国际清算银行-DeFi杠杆（英）-2024.3.docx（44页珍藏版）》请在第壹文秘上搜索。

1、DeFi1.everageWearegratefulforhelpfulcommentsfromRaphaelAuer,MikeAlonso,AndreaBarbon,AgostinoCapponi,JonanthanChiu,PedroCuadrosSolas,MarcGlowka,Alfred1.ehar,CyrilMonnet,TheoNijman,AndreasSchrimpf,VladSushko,NikolaTarashev,GaneshViSWanaIh-NaI商，ShihaoYu,ArielZetlin-Jones,ShengxingZhang,MariusZoican,and

2、participantsattheBankforInternationalSettlementsresearchmeeting,PSEworkshoponcentralclearingandmarketinfrastructures:newchallenges,GerzenseesummerworkshopinMoney,Payments,BankingandFinance,theSwissNationalBankTechnologyandFinanceseminar,INQUIREUKconference,theCEM1.AconferenceandtheEBApolicyresearchw

3、orkshop.1.iobaHeimbachacknowledgesthefinancialsupportfromtheINQUIREEuroperesearchgrant.TheviewsareoursandnotnecessarilythoseoftheBankforInternationalSettlements.1.iobaHeimbachETHZurich,hliobaethz.ch.WenqianHuangBankforInternationalSettlements,wenqian.huangbis.org.DeFi1.everageAbstractIndecentralized

4、finance(DeFi),lendingprotocolsaregovernedbypredefinedalgorithmsthatfacilitateautomaticloans-allowinguserstotakeonleverage.ThispaperexaminesDeFileverage-i.e.,theasset-to-equityratio-usingwallet-by-walletdataonmajorlendingplatforms.Theoverallleveragetypicallyrangesbetween1.4and1.9,whilethelargestandmo

5、stactiveusersconsistentlyexhibithigherleverageincomparisontotherest.1.everageismainlydrivenbyloan-to-valuerequirementsandborrowcost,aswellascryptomarketpricemovementsandsentiments.Higherborrowerleveragegenerallyundermineslendingresilience,particularlyincreasingtheshareofoutstandingdebtclosetobeingli

6、quidated.Borrowerswithhighleveragearemorelikelytotilttowardsvolatilecollateralwhentheirdebtpositionsareabouttobeliquidated.JE1.classification:G12,G23,036KeyWords:1.everage,collateralisedborrowing,decentralisedfinance,automatedalgorithm.1IntroductionDecentralizedfinance(DeFi)haswitnessedameteoricrise

7、since2020,disruptingtraditionalfinancialservicesbyofferingusersanalternativewayofconductingtransactions.AmongtheplethoraofDeFiprotocols,lendingplatformshaveemergedasacornerstone,facilitatingcollateralisedborrowingactivitiesonaneconomicallysignificantscale(Aramonte,Huang,andSchrimpf,2021;Chiu,Ozdenor

8、en,Yuan,andZhang,2022).Attheirzenith,theseplatformsheldover$35billionindepositsand$25billioninoutstandingdebt,underscoringtheirsignificancewithintheDeFiecosystem(IOSCO,2022;FSB,2023b).Despiteitsimportance,theintricaciesofuserbehaviorandpooldynamicswithinDeFilendingremainlargelyunexplored.Borrowingwi

9、thcollateralandtheassociatedleverage,however,arenotnewtopicsintraditionalfinance.Theroleofcollateralandleveragehasbeenthoroughlyinvestigatedingeneralequilibriummodels(Geanakoplos,2001;Geanakoplos,2010),infinancialintermediarytheory(AdrianandShin,2010;AdrianandShin,2014)andinasymmetricinformationprob

10、lems(AcharyaandViswanathan,2011),aswellasineventfulmarketssuchastherepurchaseagreements(i.e.,repo)(Infante,2019).However,obtainingdetaileddataonuser-levelleveragehasproventobechallenging,resultinginsporadicempiricalanalyses(withfewexceptionssuchasAng,Gorovyy,andVanInwegen,2011;KahramanandTookes,2017

11、).Thispaperaimstobridgetheseknowledgegapsbyprovidingacomprehensiveanalysisofleveragetakingbehaviorincollateralisedborrowing.Thecontributionofthepaperisthree-fold.Firstly,tothebestofourknowledge,wearethefirsttodocumentindividualDeFiwallets,leverage-whichisdefinedastheasset-to-equityratio(i.e.,theleve

12、rageconceptinAdrianandShin(2010)andAdrianandShin(2014).UsinggranulardatafromtheEthereumblockchain,ourpaperprovidesanextensiveexaminationofDeFileverage,elucidatingitsoveralltrends,groupdisparities,anddrivingfactors.Secondly,ouranalysispresentsnewempiricalevidenceonthesystemicriskimpactofhighleverageo

13、nDeFilendingplatforms.Inparticular,wefocusonlendingresilienceandstrategicsubstitutionbehaviour,basedonindividualwalletsinvestmentportfoliodata.1.astbutnotleast,althoughDeFiremainsapredominantlyself-referentialsystem,thelessonsgleanedfromDeFilending-arealworldlaboratory-couldpotentiallyberelevanttoun

14、derstandfinancialstabilityconcerns,inparticularinrepoandsecuritieslendingmarketsgiventhesimilaritiestheyshare.Wesystemicallyreviewthesimilarities,aswellasthedistinctions,betweenDeFilendingandtraditionalcollateralisedborrowing,suchasrepo.Themainfindingsconsistofthreeparts.Firstly,weexaminetheoverallt

15、rendsofDeFileverage.Throughoutoursampleperiod(January2021-March2023),theoverallleverageofDeFiusersInthecontextofDcFi,whichispseudo-anonymous,wcuse“wallets”andt4uscrs,interchangeably.Becausewalletsarestandaloneunits,largelyisolatedfromthebroaderbalancesheetoftheentity.rangesfrom1.4to1.9.Thisleveraget

16、racksthemarket-widepricemovementswithanapproximately3-monthlag,probablyreflectingspeculativemotivesincryptotrading(Biais,Bisiere,Bouvard,Casamatta,andMenkveld,2020;Auer,Comelli,Doerr,Frost,andGambacorta,2023).Thisasset-to-equityratiotypeofleverageissignificantlylowerthantheleveragepermittedbytheloan-to-value(1.TV)ratio(i.e.,theleverageconceptinGeanakoplos(2001)andFostelandGeanakoplos(2014),whichrangesfrom3.4to4.8.Userleverageexhibitshe