SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全.docx

SCI修改稿答复审稿人意见范文模板大全修改稿答复审稿人的意见（最重要的局部）1.istofResponsesDearEditorsandReviewers:Thankyouforyourletterandforthereviewers'commentsconcerningourmanuscriptentitleduPaperTitle",（ID:文章稿号）.Thosecommentsareallvaluableandveryhelpfulforrevisingandimprovingourpaper,aswellastheimportantguidingsignificancetoourresearches.WehavestudiedcommentscarefullyandhavemadecorrectionwhichWehopemeetwithapproval.Revisedportionaremarkedinredinthepaper.Themaincorrectionsinthepaperandtherespondstothereviewer'scommentsareasflowing:Respondstothereviewer'scomments:Reviewer#1:1. Responsetocomment:（简要列出意见）Response:××××××2. Responsetocomment:（简要列出意见）Response:××××××OOOOOO逐条意见答复，切忌一定不能有遗漏针对不同的问题有以下几个礼貌术语可适当用用：WeareverysorryforournegligenceofWeareverysorryforourincorrectwritingItisreallytrueasReviewersuggestedthatWehavemadecorrectionaccordingtotheReviewer'scomments.Wehavere-writtenthispartaccordingtotheReviewer'ssuggestionAsReviewersuggestedthatConsideringtheReviewer'ssuggestion,wehave最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见：Specialthankstoyouforyourgoodcomments.Reviewer#2:同上述Reviewer#3:××××××1. Otherchanges:2. 1.ine60-61,thestatementsof”werecorrectedas"”3. 1.ine107,”wasadded4. 1.ine129,”wasdeleted××××××Wetriedourbesttoimprovethemanuscriptandmadesomechangesinthemanuscript.Thesechangeswillnotinfluencethecontentandframeworkofthepaper.Andherewedidnotlistthechangesbutmarkedinredinrevisedpaper.WeappreciateforEditorsReviewers,warmworkearnestly,andhopethatthecorrectionwillmeetwithapproval.Onceagain,thankyouverymuchforyourcommentsandsuggestions以下是审稿人意见和本人的回复。与大家分享。从中可以看出，这位审稿人认真读了文章，提出很多珍贵的意见。这些意见分布在文章的各个地方。我很惊讶有人真正读了我的文章。看到这些意见，我觉得很感谢，不是因为接收文章的原因，而是这些意见能真正有助于提高文章的质量。从中还看出，答复审稿人问题的“技巧。对于答复以下问题，有的人就是一味反驳，却不加改进。记得ACSStyleGUide里面说，当审稿人问到问题的，哪怕是他理解错误，这也说明作者这么写，其他读者也会理解错误，引起歧义。因此，作者就是要修改句子，使表达不引起歧义。因此：有时间一味反驳，还不如指出具体改进在第几页、第几段。Reviewers*comments:Reviewer#3:Whilerevisingthescript,itistobesuggestedthatauthorshouldclearlyindicatetheaim&scopeofthestudyandwhilemakingconclusion,itistobementionedhowthestudyisusefulforthepracticalpurposes.Inadditionthefollowingarethefewsuggestions/comments,whichmaybeincludedwhilerevision.1. Introductionpartfirstparalastline,authormustavoidtowriteambiguousstatementi.e.,muchworkisstillahead,mayindicateproperly.2. Authorcouldnotdemonstratethereasonwhy,toselecttheorganiccompoundsuchasethylpyruvateforthisstudy?3. Experimentalpart:Itisdifficulttounderstandthein-situRAIRSexperimentswithhomemadeliquid-solidRAIRScell.Moredetailedinformationmaybeusefulfortheothersthosewhoareworkinginthearea.Photographoftheassembledcellmaybeincluded.4. Thedescriptiongivenfortheexperimentalsetup(page4)canbepresentedbyflowdiagraminstead,asaneasetounderstandthesetup.5. ReslutsPart(Page6):nCOadlayerswithidenticalmonolayercoverages',themonolayercoverage,isitbeenperformedwithsomeadsorptionmodel?Further,itwassuggestedthatCO-saturatedPtsurface,butnotmentionedaboutthesaturationexperiments.Isitobtainedafter60minofCObubbling?6. Page12,2ndpara:ThedisplacementofEtPybyCC14flushing,isitconfirmedbytheEtPypeaks?Ifso,ithastobementionedclearlyinthepara.Alsointhesamepara,authorreferredforFig.7aand7bbutinthefigures,itdidn'tappear,onlyfigure7appeared.Ifeelitrefersforfigure7,portionAandB,tobecorrected.Similarly,inthetextreferredthefig2a,2b.etcbutonthefiguresheetitismentionedas2A,2B.etc.tobecorrected.7. Page14,1stpara:'contaminationofthePtsurfacebycorrosionofo-ringsinhighconcentrationEtPy',butthestatementhasnotbeensupportedbyotherevidence/!iterature.8. Pages14through17:theobservedreactivityofvarioussolventsforadsorbedCOonthePtsurface(figs3&4)hastobediscussedmoreprecisely.Thisreviewerisunabletofollowthereasonwhytheyshoweddifferentreactivity,isitprincipallyduetotheorganicmoieties,orduetotheimpuritiesofcommerciallyavailablechemicalsoramixedeffect.Ithastobeclearlydemonstrated,however,theonlyexperimentperformedwithCO/water?CC14woulddifficulttodescribeitindetail.9. Theauthortrytorestrainwithrepeatedargumentsinthetexte.g.,page3para1:Itwasgeneralizedthat,alsoappearedonpage21firstpara.10. Captionsofthefiguresaretoolong,thedetaileddescriptionalreadygiveninthetext,hencewouldnotbeincludedhere.Captionsshouldbeshortandcrispy.DearEditor,Iquiteappreciateyourfavoriteconsiderationandthereviewer'sinsightfulcomments.NowIhaverevisedtheJC1S-06-247exactlyaccordingtothereviewer'scomments,andfoundthesecommentsareveryhelpful.Ihopethisrevisioncanmakemypapermoreacceptable.Therevisionswereaddressedpointbypointbelow.(generalTheobjectiveofthisresearchwasaddedatthebeginningofthethirdparagraphofIntroduction.HowthestudyisusefulforpracticalpurposeswasaddedattheendofConclusionasoneparagraph.1 Ambiguousstatementi.e.,“muchworkisstillahead,wasdeleted.2 Ethylpyruvatewasusedhereasatypicalcompound(containingtwocarbonylgroups)todemonstratethefeasibilityofusingourdiagnosingtooltodetectlow-coverageCO(comingfromdecarbonylationofEtPy)attheliquid-solidinterface.EtPyisareactantusedinliquid-phasechiralcatalysis,andslig